Current:Home > MyAppeals court makes it harder to disqualify absentee ballots in battleground Wisconsin-LoTradeCoin
Appeals court makes it harder to disqualify absentee ballots in battleground Wisconsin
View Date:2024-12-24 10:40:54
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Absentee ballots still count in Wisconsin even if voters’ witnesses fail to give election clerks their full address, a state appeals court has ruled.
The decision Thursday by the 4th District Court of Appeals is expected to expand the number of absentee ballots that will be counted in the battleground state with yet another tight presidential race looming in November.
Each of the last two presidential elections in Wisconsin was decided by fewer than 23,000 votes. Polls show another close race this year between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump. Biden campaign officials have said winning the so-called blue wall of Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin offers the president the clearest path to victory.
Wisconsin law requires absentee voters to submit their ballots to local election clerks in an envelope marked with a witness signature and address. But the statutes don’t define an address in that context.
Dane County Circuit Judge Ryan Nilsestuen ruled in January in two cases brought by liberals that clerks can still count ballots even if a witness address lacks the municipality or ZIP code or simply says “same” or “ditto” if the witness lives with the voter.
Republican legislators asked the appellate court to either toss out Nilsestuen’s ruling or find that an address is best understood as a witness’ street number, street name and municipality.
What to know about the 2024 Election
- Democracy: American democracy has overcome big stress tests since 2020. More challenges lie ahead in 2024.
- AP’s Role: The Associated Press is the most trusted source of information on election night, with a history of accuracy dating to 1848. Learn more.
- We want to hear from you: If you didn’t vote in the 2020 election, would anything change your mind about voting?
- Read the latest: Follow AP’s live coverage of this year’s election.
The appeals court upheld Nilsestuen’s decision on a 3-0 vote, ruling that witnesses need only supply enough information so municipal clerks can identify them and communicate with them if necessary. If legislators wanted absentee voter witnesses to supply more specific address components, they could have mandated it, Judge Chris Taylor wrote.
Taylor is a former Democratic legislator. Judge Brian Blanchard is a former Democratic district attorney and Judge Rachel Graham served as a clerk for liberal state Supreme Court Justice Ann Walsh Bradley for four years, according to her biography on the Wisconsin Court System’s website.
The Republican lawmakers’ attorney, Misha Tseytlin, didn’t immediately respond to an email from The Associated Press on Friday seeking comment on the ruling and inquiring about whether the GOP would ask the state Supreme Court to take the case. Winning the case at that level would be an uphill fight for the Republicans given that a four-justice liberal majority controls the high court.
Last week the Supreme Court allowed local election officials to place absentee ballot drop boxes around their communities. The decision undid a 2022 ruling from the court’s then-conservative majority limiting drop box use to only clerk’s offices.
veryGood! (278)
Related
- 2 credit unions in Mississippi and Louisiana are planning to merge
- A chapter ends for this historic Asian American bookstore, but its story continues
- President Biden: Climate champion or fossil fuel friend?
- A brief biography of 'X,' the letter that Elon Musk has plastered everywhere
- Mariah Carey's Amazon Holiday Merch Is All I Want for Christmas—and It's Selling Out Fast!
- Jesse Palmer Teases Wild Season of Bachelor in Paradise
- Every Time Margot Robbie Channeled Barbie IRL
- Should EPA Back-Off Pollution Controls to Help LNG Exports Replace Russian Gas in Germany?
- Tampa Bay Rays' Wander Franco arrested again in Dominican Republic, according to reports
- The racial work gap for financial advisors
Ranking
- Kentucky gets early signature win at Champions Classic against Duke | Opinion
- Opinion: The global gold rush puts the Amazon rainforest at greater risk
- This Foot Mask with 50,000+ 5 Star Reviews on Amazon Will Knock the Dead Skin Right Off Your Feet
- Activists Laud Biden’s New Environmental Justice Appointee, But Concerns Linger Over Equity and Funding
- College Football Fix podcast addresses curious CFP rankings and previews Week 12
- In the US West, Researchers Consider a Four-Legged Tool to Fight Two Foes: Wildfire and Cheatgrass
- Twitter's concerning surge
- Financier buys Jeffrey Epstein's private islands, with plans to create a resort
Recommendation
-
Tropical Storm Sara threatens to bring flash floods and mudslides to Central America
-
In Nevada’s Senate Race, Energy Policy Is a Stark Divide Between Cortez Masto and Laxalt
-
Manure-Eating Worms Could Be the Dairy Industry’s Climate Solution
-
Kyle Richards and Mauricio Umansky Address “Untrue” Divorce Rumors
-
Sofia Richie Reveals 5-Month-Old Daughter Eloise Has a Real Phone
-
A chapter ends for this historic Asian American bookstore, but its story continues
-
Why does the U.S. have so many small banks? And what does that mean for our economy?
-
Pregnant Lindsay Lohan Shares New Selfie as She Celebrates Her 37th Birthday